The 2022 Gillibrand–Rubio UAP Amendment: A Data-first Explainer

In December 2022, Congress passed what is widely known as the Gillibrand–Rubio UAP amendment as part of the Fiscal Year 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). 

It embedded the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, in law and ordered a set of concrete deliverables. Those included a secure whistleblower channel that pierces nondisclosure agreements, semiannual classified briefings and annual unclassified reports to Congress, a historical record review back to 1945, a science plan, and a requirement to notify congressional leaders within seventy two hours if the reporting channel reveals an unreported restricted program. 

Much of the amendment is now codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 3373 and 3373b. (Legal Information Institute)

Since then, AARO has published annual UAP reporting, opened a protected submission portal for current or former government personnel and contractors, briefed Congress repeatedly, produced Volume 1 of a historical-record report, and posted case files along with imagery. The public law texts and official sites provide a rare, well lit paper trail in a subject long starved of documentation. (AARO)

How Washington codified modern UAP oversight

From task forces to a permanent office

Congress first sketched a modern UAP office in the FY2022 NDAA, then the Department of Defense stood up AARO in July 2022. The Pentagon’s establishment memo stated that creating AARO was a significant step toward domain awareness and transparency while protecting sensitive sources and methods. (U.S. Department of War)

What changed in December 2022

The FY2023 NDAA and the accompanying intelligence authorization provisions did several things that matter for researchers, witnesses, and policymakers:

  • Anchored AARO in statute and set its reporting chain. The law directs the AARO Director to report to the Deputy Secretary of Defense and the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, while handling administrative matters with the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Broadened the scope from aerial to anomalous. Congress replaced the earlier “unidentified aerial phenomena” wording with “unidentified anomalous phenomena,” and defined UAP to include airborne objects, transmedium objects that cross air, space, or water, and submerged objects with related performance signatures. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Built a secure, protected reporting mechanism. 50 U.S.C. § 3373b requires the Secretary of Defense, through AARO and in consultation with the DNI, to create a secure reporting channel for events relating to UAP and for any government or contractor program touching UAP. The statute explicitly lists material retrieval, material analysis, reverse engineering, testing, and security as eligible topics. Reports shared through this mechanism are protected from nondisclosure agreements and retaliation. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Pierced restrictive NDAs and set a seventy two hour rule. If an authorized disclosure appears to involve a restricted access or special access program that has not been explicitly and clearly reported to the defense and intelligence committees, the Secretary must notify those committees and congressional leaders within seventy two hours. The statute also directs a search for UAP-related nondisclosure orders and requires access for Congress. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Mandated deliverables and timelines. Congress ordered semiannual classified briefings through December 31, 2026, and annual unclassified reports for four years. It also tasked a historical record report focused on 1945 to the present and required cooperation from the National Archives. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Required a science plan. AARO must supervise a science plan to test theories that could account for performance characteristics beyond known state of the art, and advise on investments needed to replicate or understand such characteristics. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Directed whole-of-government coordination. AARO is required to coordinate with FAA, NASA, DHS, NOAA, NSF, DOE, and to consult with allies and partners when appropriate. (Legal Information Institute)

These provisions live primarily at 50 U.S.C. § 3373 (AARO’s structure, duties, reporting, definitions) and § 3373b (secure reporting, nondisclosure provisions, and protections). The enrolled public law is Public Law 117-263. (Legal Information Institute)

What the amendment has produced so far

Annual reporting and the size of the dataset

  • In January 2023, the intelligence community published the unclassified 2022 Annual Report on UAP, stating 510 total reports as of August 30, 2022. This combined 144 earlier cases with 366 new reports. (Director of National Intelligence)
  • In October 2023, the FY2023 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP reported 291 additional submissions between August 31, 2022 and April 30, 2023, bringing AARO’s holdings to 801 reports at that time. The report characterized most cases as ordinary once sufficient data is obtained and noted no confirmed adverse health effects. (AARO)
  • In 2024, AARO released Volume 1 of the Historical Record Report required by Congress. The report stated that AARO found no empirical evidence that the government has confirmed extraterrestrial technology in its historical reviews. News coverage emphasized that conclusion while noting another volume would follow. (U.S. Department of War)

A protected reporting channel and practical instructions

AARO implemented the secure reporting requirement with an online Submit a Report portal. At present, it accepts reports from current or former U.S. government employees, service members, or contractors with direct knowledge of government programs or activities related to UAP, dating back to 1945. The site includes a report form and a user guide. The Department of Defense announced the launch in October 2023. (AARO)

Hearings and oversight

The law assigned routine oversight to Congress. That has played out in several venues:

  • Senate Armed Services Subcommittee hearing on AARO on April 19, 2023, chaired by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, with AARO Director Sean M. Kirkpatrick as witness. The committee posted the transcript and materials. (Armed Services Committee)
  • House Oversight hearing on UAP on July 26, 2023, featuring testimony by David Grusch, Ryan Graves, and David Fravor. The committee and the Office of the Clerk have posted the transcript and record of the hearing. (Congress.gov)
  • AARO congressional and press products page centralizes the official reports, transcripts, and presentations, making it easier to track required deliverables. (AARO)

Leadership and institutionalization

The Department of Defense designated physicist Sean M. Kirkpatrick as AARO’s first director. 

In August 2024, DoD announced Dr. Jon T. Kosloski as the new director, and he provided an updated statement for the Senate subcommittee later that year. These appointments matter because the amendment set AARO’s direct reporting line and tasked it with scientific and operational work that extends across several agencies. (U.S. Department of War)

Public facing records and case releases

AARO’s website now includes official UAP imagery, case resolution summaries, and visualized reporting trends, reflecting a shift toward standardized and publicly releasable outputs that Congress asked for. (AARO)

What the law actually says, in plain language

Below is a clause-by-clause translation of the two most important code sections.

50 U.S.C. § 3373 Establishment and duties of AARO

  • Status and reporting. AARO’s Director reports operationally to the Deputy Secretary of Defense and the Principal Deputy DNI, and administratively within the intelligence and security enterprise. This embeds the office at a high level rather than as a transient task force. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Core duties. Synchronize and standardize UAP data collection and analysis, enforce timely reporting, assess threats and adversary links, coordinate across FAA, NASA, DHS, NOAA, NSF, DOE, and consult allies and partners. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Rapid response and field investigations. DoD and the DNI must designate officials and resources for rapid on-scene investigation of UAP incidents, with authority to draw in outside cleared expertise. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Science plan. AARO must supervise a science plan to test theories that could account for characteristics beyond current state of the art, and to inform future investments. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Historical record report. AARO must prepare a report to Congress that compiles and itemizes the government’s historical record on UAP back to January 1, 1945, including records, interviews, open source analysis, and any documented efforts to obscure information. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Annual reports and semiannual briefings. An unclassified annual report is required for four years, with a classified annex as needed, and classified briefings twice a year through 2026. Required elements include counts of incidents in restricted airspace, assessments of nuclear associated UAP reporting, and updates on coordination with allies. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Definitions. UAP includes airborne, transmedium, and submerged categories. Congress also defined transmedium objects as those observed transitioning between space, air, and bodies of water. (Legal Information Institute)

50 U.S.C. § 3373b Secure reporting and protections

  • Who can report and what. The Secretary of Defense, acting through AARO, must provide a secure mechanism for reporting any UAP-related event and any government or contractor program relating to UAP. The examples named in the law include material retrieval and analysis, reverse engineering, detection and tracking, testing, and security protection. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Piercing NDAs and protecting witnesses. Authorized disclosures to this channel are not restricted by nondisclosure agreements, are deemed compliant with classification rules when made through the mechanism, and are protected from retaliation. The Secretary and the DNI are required to set enforcement procedures. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Seventy two hour notification. If the disclosure indicates an unreported restricted access or special access program, AARO must ensure that congressional defense and intelligence committees and congressional leadership are notified within seventy two hours. (Legal Information Institute)
  • Searching for legacy nondisclosure orders. Departments, agencies, and contractors must search for UAP-related nondisclosure orders and provide copies to AARO, which must then make them accessible to the defense and intelligence committees and leadership, with recurring briefings through fiscal year 2026. (U.S. Code)

Known figures and their roles

  • Senator Kirsten Gillibrand chaired the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, convened the April 19, 2023 AARO hearing, and has repeatedly pressed for full funding and implementation of the office’s mandate. (Armed Services Committee)
  • Senator Marco Rubio served as Vice Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee and partnered with Gillibrand on UAP provisions and funding support for the office. (Kirsten Gillibrand)
  • Dr. Sean M. Kirkpatrick was AARO’s first director and testified at the April 19, 2023 hearing, describing the mission, caseload, and analytic approach. (Armed Services Committee)
  • Dr. Jon T. Kosloski was appointed AARO director in August 2024, delivered a Senate statement in November 2024, and has overseen subsequent reporting. (U.S. Department of War)
  • House witnesses David Grusch, Ryan Graves, and David Fravor placed competing claims on the record in July 2023, which in turn sharpened oversight and public debate. (Congress.gov)

Impact, measured

Reporting volume and standardization. The 2022 ODNI report placed total reports at 510 as of late August 2022. The FY2023 consolidated report added 291 more and put AARO’s total holdings at 801 by April 30, 2023. The same report detailed morphology distributions and geography, and emphasized that higher quality data tends to resolve more cases. (Director of National Intelligence)

Process transparency. AARO created a protected online reporting channel that implements the law’s secure mechanism, complete with a user guide and a publicly visible form. The Department of Defense announced the launch in October 2023. (AARO)

Historical review. AARO delivered Volume 1 of its congressionally mandated historical record report. The office stated it found no empirical evidence that any U.S. program confirmed extraterrestrial technology, a conclusion covered widely by major outlets. Congress required this product under the same 2022 statutory authority that broadened AARO. (U.S. Department of War)

Congressional oversight cycle. The pattern of semiannual classified briefings and annual unclassified reports is now institutionalized, with AARO’s congressional products posted centrally. (AARO)

Public-facing casework. Case resolution summaries and official imagery give outside researchers the minimum common dataset needed to test hypotheses about radar artifacts, parallax, balloons, birds, and other candidates. That is exactly what a data-first regime is supposed to produce. (AARO)

Controversies and tensions

Competing narratives. In July 2023, House witnesses alleged the existence of crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs, while AARO’s 2024 historical report said it found no empirical confirmation of extraterrestrial technology in government holdings. This is the core tension shaping public debate. (Congress.gov)

What counts as evidence. The secure reporting statute explicitly names material retrieval and reverse engineering as topics that can be disclosed to AARO. That legal phrasing neither confirms nor denies such programs; it simply creates a channel for reporting and requires rapid congressional notification if undisclosed restricted programs are indicated. (Legal Information Institute)

Transparency versus classification. The amendment demands unclassified annual reports, but many sensor systems and operational contexts remain classified. AARO has published declassified case materials and a declassification explainer, but the friction is structural and will likely persist. (AARO)

Definitions and scope. The shift from aerial to anomalous broadened the aperture to include transmedium and submerged categories. That answered years of complaints that legacy definitions could not capture cross-domain objects, but it also widened the target set for analysis, which can dilute scarce resources if not prioritized carefully. (Legal Information Institute)

Implications

For current and former government personnel and contractors. The law removed key disincentives by protecting authorized disclosures from nondisclosure agreements and retaliation, and it created a clearly advertised reporting portal. 

If an undisclosed restricted program is implicated, Congress must be notified within seventy two hours. That is an unprecedented accountability hook for this topic. (Legal Information Institute)

For agencies and archives. The historical record directive forced a sweep of records, including cooperation from the National Archives. It also mandated that departments search for UAP-related nondisclosure orders and provide them to AARO for congressional access. 

This brings paper trails into view that had been dispersed across agencies and contractors. (Legal Information Institute)

For science and industry. The science plan and reporting requirements move UAP from ad hoc anecdotes to structured datasets. That invites independent replication and statistical work by academia and private sector partners in radar processing, EO and IR imaging, and AI-assisted attribution. (Legal Information Institute)

For allies and civil aviation. The statute’s explicit coordination with FAA and NASA, plus allied consultation, should gradually converge reporting schemas internationally and in the commercial sector. That will help separate new adversary capabilities, air safety issues, and truly anomalous cases. (Legal Information Institute)

Data points at a glance

Where the debate runs hottest

Flight safety and national security. Even in reports that resolve to balloons or birds, proximity to restricted airspace or critical infrastructure sustains Congressional attention. The statute requires explicit reporting on incidents near nuclear assets and Nuclear Regulatory Commission-regulated sites, plus ally coordination updates. (Legal Information Institute)

Historical claims versus contemporary analysis. The historical report’s first volume found no empirical evidence of extraterrestrial technology, yet witnesses have alleged the opposite. This gap fuels media cycles and legislative proposals aimed at accelerated declassification. (Reuters)

The culture shift. The law’s protected channel and anti-reprisal language are changing incentives. It is now procedurally safer for insiders to report UAP-related programs or events, with direct congressional visibility built into the mechanism. That is an unusual degree of statutory sunlight for a topic long handled in shadows. (Legal Information Institute)

Bottom line

The Gillibrand–Rubio UAP amendment did not answer the big question. It did something more durable. It is a hard-wired process. Congress broadened definitions to match cross-domain observations, created a secure witness channel with legal protections, pulled the office up the chain of command, forced a historical review, and tied it all to recurring, measurable outputs that are now visible enough for outside scrutiny. 

Whether the ultimate remainder proves adversarial, prosaic, or truly anomalous, this legal scaffolding is the foundation the United States has not had before.

References

Public Law 117-263, FY2023 National Defense Authorization Act, including Section 1673 on UAP reporting procedures. (Congress.gov)

50 U.S.C. § 3373, Establishment of the All domain Anomaly Resolution Office, duties, reporting, definitions. (Legal Information Institute)

50 U.S.C. § 3373b, UAP reporting procedures, whistleblower protections, NDA provisions, seventy two hour notification. (Legal Information Institute)

DoD memo announcing the establishment of AARO, July 20, 2022. (U.S. Department of War)

ODNI, 2022 Annual Report on UAP. (Director of National Intelligence)

AARO and ODNI, FY2023 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP. (AARO)

AARO, Historical Record Report, Volume 1; contemporaneous coverage. (U.S. Department of War)

AARO, Congressional and Press Products index. (AARO)

AARO, Submit a Report page, form, and user guide. (AARO)

Senate Armed Services, AARO hearing transcript, April 19, 2023. (Armed Services Committee)

U.S. House Oversight, UAP hearing transcript, July 26, 2023. (Congress.gov)

AARO, Official UAP Imagery and Case Resolution Reports. (AARO)

DoD press release, AARO Director Jon T. Kosloski. (U.S. Department of War)

Claims taxonomy

Verified

Probable

  • The protected channel and clarified reporting guidance reduced stigma and increased reporting rates among military and civil aviation communities. The 2023 report’s trend analysis supports this reading. (AARO)

Disputed

  • Assertions that the U.S. government possesses recovered nonhuman craft or biologics. AARO’s historical review reported no empirical confirmation; witnesses and some members of Congress allege otherwise. (Reuters)

Legend

  • Cultural narratives about secret repositories and unbroken lines of crash retrieval since mid-century. The amendment treats these as claims to be tested via documented processes rather than as established facts.

Misidentification

  • AARO’s public case releases include multiple instances resolved as balloons or migratory birds, demonstrating how technical artifacts and perception can mimic anomalies. (AARO)

Speculation labels

Hypothesis. The seventy two hour notification clause and the explicit inclusion of material retrieval and reverse engineering in the secure reporting statute suggest that Congress anticipated the possibility that undisclosed restricted programs might exist. The clause is a tripwire for immediate oversight if credible authorized disclosures point that way. This is an inference from the text and timelines, not proof that such programs exist. (Legal Information Institute)

Witness interpretation. House testimony in July 2023 interpreted government actions and rumors as evidence of multi decade crash retrieval and exploitation efforts. Those statements are on the record as witness claims; AARO’s historical review has not corroborated them. (Congress.gov)

Researcher opinion. From a policy design perspective, the amendment’s science plan and data standardization are the most important long-term features. They create a repeatable pipeline where ambiguous cases move toward explanation, and the remainder can be isolated for deeper study without stigma. That architecture is the clearest path to progress whether the final explanations are prosaic, adversarial, or truly anomalous. (Legal Information Institute)

SEO keywords

Gillibrand Rubio UAP amendment; 2022 NDAA UAP; AARO reporting; 50 USC 3373; 50 USC 3373b; UAP whistleblower protections; UAP secure reporting portal; AARO historical record report; UAP congressional briefing; UAP annual report; transmedium UAP definition; UAP science plan; AARO case resolution; UAP material retrieval; reverse engineering reporting; UAP oversight timeline

Varginha 1996: Brazil’s Incredible UAP Crash and NHI Case

In January 1996 the mid-sized city of Varginha, in Minas Gerais, became the stage for one of the most discussed UAP narratives on record. 

Reports ranged from a low altitude craft over farmland to encounters with a small, injured being with a strong odor, to a flurry of military vehicles, a hospital handoff, and the subsequent death of a young military police officer. 

For three decades, the core witnesses have remained unusually consistent. 

The Brazilian Army opened an inquiry and later concluded the public had misinterpreted routine activity and that the creature seen by three young women was likely a local man with disabilities. 

The debate has only intensified, propelled in recent years by James Fox’s documentary Moment of Contact and a new round of interviews and podcasts. (Globoplay)

This article reconstructs the known record with a data-first approach. It integrates contemporaneous media, sworn military files now hosted by Brazil’s Military Justice archive, medical and municipal mentions, and the modern documentary and podcast corpus. 

Our goal is to isolate what is documented, what is testified, what is disputed, and what remains open.

A timeline built from the sources

January 13-19 1996
Farmers report a cylindrical craft in distress that later impacted near the Maiolini area, with a sulfur‑ammonia odor and debris including ultra‑light, shape‑retaining fragments.

 

Cigar-shape UAP in distress, bellowing vapor, over farmland in Varginha, MG, Brazil, 1996, as described by witnesses.
(Rendering 2025 – UAPedia)

On a farm outside Varginha, the couple Oralina Augusta de Freitas and Eurico Rodrigues de Freitas report their cattle in sudden distress. 

They describe another object, a gray, cigar-like object hovering at low altitude for a long interval, which aligns with the first wave of local rumors. These details were later summarized in national magazines and TV retrospectives. (VEJA)

January 20, 1996, mid-afternoon
Three young women, Liliane and Valquíria Silva and their friend Kátia Andrade Xavier, take a shortcut through a vacant lot in the Jardim Andere neighborhood and claim to encounter a crouched, small being with oily brown skin, bony protrusions on the head, and very large red eyes. 

The smell is described as strong and unpleasant. Their account enters national media on Fantástico and shortly after reaches international press. (Globoplay)

20 January 1996, day into evening
Multiple residents report a low, methodical grid search by a disc‑shaped craft, distinct from the earlier cylinder. Fox interprets the flight behavior as a search‑and‑rescue pattern, which remains researcher opinion rather than a settled fact. 

January 20–21, 1996
Reports of military and emergency vehicles moving through parts of Varginha circulate. Globo and local affiliates cover the story. National and international articles follow within months. (Globoplay)

Regional Hospital intake via a back entrance of a living non‑human, per Dr. Ítalo Venturelli’s late 2025 on‑record testimony, followed by an armed removal and threats to staff. Persistent reports of a pervasive ammonia odor within the facility are consistent with earlier civilian descriptions. (YouTube)

January 1996, post‑incident logistics
Reports of U.S. helicopters and a subsequent USAF landing at Campinas Airport, Brazil, for transfer, followed by a national‑security denial to a U.S. records request in Fox’s film. 

Late January 1996
A local military police corporal, Marco Eli Chereze, falls ill after a minor procedure to drain an axillary abscess and dies on February 15 from generalized infection, according to contemporary press and later TV investigations that interviewed his treating physician. The death becomes a lightning rod in the case narrative. (MD-M09)

Late January–February 1996
Treating physicians and pathologists on camera in 2025 describe unprecedented bacterial behavior in samples from Marco Eli Chereze. The official record still lists death by postoperative sepsis, so this remains a contested medical point pending document release. 

May 1996
The commandant of the Army’s sergeants school, ESA, orders an internal review regarding claims of Army involvement in any creature capture or unusual transport. (Transparencia Achados)

February–June 1997
The Army opens Military Police Inquiry No. 18/1997, which compiles testimony and documents. In 2010, portions of its conclusions are made public to the press. The ARQUIMEDES archive confirms the filing and status of IPM 18/1997 and hosts digitized images of the two volumes. (Arquimedes)

2010–2011
The magazine IstoÉ runs a detailed piece on the official explanation and VEJA summarizes key points, including documentation that Army trucks were in Varginha that week for scheduled maintenance with an invoice on file. A federal “request for information” was lodged in Congress years later seeking any official confirmation of exotic captures in 1996. (IstoÉ)

2022–2025
James Fox releases Moment of Contact, adding interviews with named and masked participants, including the driver referred to as “Military X,” who claims a hospital handoff and transport to the nearby ESA base. Fox expands the record in long form podcasts. (YouTube)

Late 2025
James Fox comes out with additional witness testimony on film, including a respectable neurosurgeon who claims met the non-human inside the hospital. (News Nation)

Eyewitness accounts, as recorded

The farm observation

Oralina and Eurico de Freitas describe a cylindrical or submarine-shaped craft moving slowly and silently over their pasture in the small hours of the morning. The account has been published repeatedly in Brazilian national media over a span of years and is widely cited in anniversary coverage. (VEJA)

The crash-site witness

Carlos de Souza, a pilot and driver, has long said he saw a low flying object in distress heading toward the outskirts of Varginha earlier that weekend, which he later connected to reports of a retrieval. The modern treatment of his account appears in Moment of Contact and in interviews around the film’s release. (YouTube)

The Jardim Andere encounter

The three women’s description anchors the case. They report a crouched being with a head larger than expected for its body, shiny brown skin, three ridges or protrusions on the head, and very large eyes with a reddish appearance. They also emphasize an acrid, strong odor. 

Their testimony appears in Globo’s 1996 segment and remains consistent in later interviews, including those filmed for Moment of Contact. The Wall Street Journal captured many of these descriptors in its 1996 feature. (Globoplay)

The city hospital handoff

In Fox’s film a soldier anonymized as “Military X” states he picked up a living being from Humanitas Hospital in Varginha and transported it to the ESA base in Três Corações. A regional newspaper column summarizing the film repeats the claim with route details and the context that his identity was masked. (Examiner News)

The policeman who died

Corporal Marco Eli Chereze, age twenty three, underwent a minor procedure days after the reported UAP events and died several weeks later of generalized infection, according to magazine reporting and TV interviews with his physician. 

His death certificate cause has been described in press as respiratory failure with sepsis post surgery. It is not contested that he died quickly from infection, the point of contention is whether the infection had any connection to field activity. (MD-M09)

Secondary citywide threads

Contemporaneous talk included a firefighter call about an unusual animal, and a later rumor that a small number of animals at the city zoo died in the months after. National outlets and summaries note these as part of the web of claims rather than verified official findings. (Wikipedia)

Government and institutional involvement

What the army said
ESA leadership opened an internal review in May 1996, followed by Military Police Inquiry 18/1997. The Superior Military Court archive confirms the inquiry’s metadata and hosts images from both volumes. 

The inquiry concluded there was no capture of a non-human being, that noted Army truck movements were for scheduled maintenance at a Mercedes concession in Varginha, and that the creature described by the three women was likely a local man with mental disability, nicknamed “Mudinho.” IstoÉ and VEJA covered those points in detail when the conclusions became public years later. (Arquimedes)

New claims about air movements and custody
A former chief of police told Fox he observed a tarp‑covered, non‑human body at ESA amid unusual helicopter traffic and senior officer presence. Fox also attributes to a Brazilian flight control source that a USAF aircraft landed at Campinas for a transfer without standard clearance, and he presents a classified denial from a U.S. agency to his team’s flight‑records request for the period 13-27 January 1996. These assertions have not yet been matched to published Brazilian or U.S. air‑traffic records. They are flagged here as investigator claims that, if documented, would materially affect the case history.

The Brazilian Army retains the 2010 IPM conclusion that the girls likely misidentified a local man nicknamed “Mudinho,” and that army truck movements were routine. This remains the standing official position. (Wikipedia)

What Congress asked years later

A formal request for information in Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies sought clarification about any participation by the Military Police of Minas Gerais, the Fire Brigade, Army units, hospitals in Varginha, or universities such as UNICAMP in events that could amount to a capture or transport of unknown beings. 

The request underscores continuing public interest and the desire to see logs and movements documented officially. (Portal da Câmara dos Deputados)

What media documented contemporaneously

Globo’s Fantástico aired interviews with the three women, local residents, and skeptics in the first two weeks after the reports, and that segment remains accessible in Globo’s streaming archive and Memória Globo portal. 

The Wall Street Journal ran a feature the same year, an unusual level of international attention for a Latin American UAP case of the period. (Globoplay)

James Fox, Moment of Contact, and the modern record

Fox’s 2022 documentary re-centers the case for a global audience. The film includes on-camera testimony from the principal civilian witnesses, interviews with physicians and municipal officials willing to speak on the record, and the masked account of a military driver who claims hands-on transport of a living being. Distribution pages confirm the film’s availability and synopsis. 

Fox expanded on unresolved pieces in long form podcasts with Joe Rogan in 2023 and again in 2024, where he discussed witness intimidation claims, hospital recollections, and the rationale for masking certain sources. (YouTube)

Independent coverage and reviews, both supportive and critical, emphasize that the documentary’s value lies in preserving first person Brazilian testimony that was not easily accessible in English in the late nineteen nineties. 

Fox’s teams also collected statements from former local officials that had not been collated in one narrative before. (IJPR)

2025 medical testimony and logistics claims

In November 2025, documentarian James Fox put on the record a named hospital witness, Dr. Ítalo Denelle Venturelli, the head neurosurgeon at Varginha’s Regional Hospital. Venturelli states he had approximately four minutes of face‑to‑face clinical contact with a living non‑human brought in through a back entrance on 20–21 January 1996, that he briefly touched the being, and that he experienced calm, non‑verbal communication that he interpreted as telepathic. He describes prominent red eyes, three small cranial bumps, very light skin under clinical lighting, and a strong sulfur‑ammonia odor also reported by civilians earlier in the day. Venturelli says a mixed armed detail then burst into the room, removed the patient, and warned staff not to speak. (YouTube)

Fox also reports that two forensic physicians connected to military policeman Marco Eli Chereze’s case described highly atypical bacterial behavior in tissue samples taken during the autopsy, with clinicians stating that the infection did not respond to an aggressive therapeutic regimen in a healthy young adult. These medical statements are newly attributed and on camera in Fox’s update, though the underlying lab records have not yet been made public.

On the logistics side, a former regional chief of police told Fox he observed a tarp‑covered, non‑human body at the ESA base amid unusual helicopter traffic and an unusual concentration of senior Brazilian officers. Fox further says a Brazilian flight control source reported a U.S. Air Force aircraft landing at Campinas for a transfer and that his team later received a classified denial to a U.S. records request covering inbound flights for the 13–27 January 1996 window. These are investigator claims that require documentary corroboration.

Venturelli’s statements also surfaced in Brazil’s national press, which summarized his description of the being’s appearance and demeanor and confirmed that his on‑record testimony exists beyond the documentary. (CNN Brasil)

Sorting evidence from interpretation

Convergences in the testimony

Multiple civilians describe a small being with disproportionate head, thin body, and a striking smell. The women’s account is recorded quickly in national media. The farm couple’s description of a slow-moving cylindrical object in the pre-dawn hours broadens the window of activity, and the crash-path witness adds a dynamic element. 

A cluster of city rumors about hospital activity, firefighters, and the zoo then fill in the social landscape. The persistence and internal consistency of the women’s core description over decades is noteworthy and is captured in both contemporaneous and modern sources. (Globoplay)

Cultural frames in witness language

Witnesses and the neurosurgeon independently used devil‑like and angelic language to describe the same morphology, a common cultural mapping when communities face unfamiliar agents. This lens neither confirms nor dismisses the underlying event, but it helps interpret testimony tone and memory encoding. 

Official counter narrative

The Army’s IPM points to routine truck movements and maintenance bills as the reason for Army vehicles in town, rainy summer weather that could explain emergency activity, and the existence of a local man with disabilities whose appearance could match a frightened misidentification by young witnesses. 

Those conclusions were published by the national press and are a matter of record. (VEJA)

Medical facts about Marco Eli Chereze

The data point is strong and simple. A healthy twenty three year old policeman underwent a minor procedure, developed a rapid infection, and died in under a month. Brazilian reporting describes respiratory failure and sepsis. 

Open sources continue to record post procedure sepsis as the cause of death for Corporal Marco Eli Chereze on 15 February 1996. In 2025, though, two physicians and a lab founder connected to his case gave on camera statements describing bacterial behavior in histology and culture work that they had “never seen” before or since, and clinicians recalled non responsiveness to an aggressive therapeutic regimen. These are consequential medical claims that require publication of the autopsy, histology blocks, and lab workups for independent review before any etiological linkage to the UAP events can be responsibly made. 

The NORAD rumor

A persistent line claims North American Aerospace Defense Command warned Brazil of a descending object, which would imply allied tracking and cross-national coordination. There is no official confirmation of such a warning in any publicly accessible record. 

When asked in recent years by a skeptical outlet, NORAD reportedly stated it could not confirm any involvement. 

Cross-domain signals and patterns

The odor detail recurs in other close encounter testimonies in world casework and in certain hazardous material contexts, pointing to either a strong priming effect in folklore or a physical environmental factor such as biological exudate, chemical leak, or even trapped sewage near the lot. 

The three women’s report predated most of the mass attention, which reduces the likelihood that their olfactory detail was borrowed. This is an interpretive observation, not a proof claim. (Globoplay)

The visual description of a being that appears weak, crouched, and sensitive to light or heat mirrors many reports that also associate UAP with short lived ground events after a dynamic aerial observation window, as suggested by the farm and crash-path testimony. 

This concatenation may describe an injury and a search and recovery pattern, or it may describe coincident rumor formation around an urban legend. The data permit both readings; the deciding factor would be physical evidence, which remains absent in public archives.

What remains unresolved

  1. Hospital logs and chain-of-custody
    No unredacted emergency room or transfer logs have been released by city hospitals that show an unusual patient intake or special military custody on the key dates. Fox’s film suggests such activity through interviews, but documents remain sealed or unproduced. (YouTube)
  2. Vehicle movement logs
    The Army’s IPM points to maintenance work orders and dealership invoices to explain truck presence in town. Publication of complete unit logs for the week, with timestamps and routes, would sharpen the picture. VEJA reported on the invoice and amount, but the underlying attachment is not widely accessible online to the public. (VEJA)
  3. Forensic or biological material
    There is no public biological sample, no chain-of-custody artifact, and no released lab result connected conclusively to a non human intelligence from Varginha.
  4. Pathology audit
    Seek a court‑supervised search for the Chereze case autopsy report, any remaining FFPE tissue blocks, slides, and the original microbiology worksheets. Pre‑register metagenomic testing and blinded histology review if materials exist.
  5. Hospital records
    Request ER access logs, OR schedules, security postings, and transfer sheets at Regional Hospital for 19–22 January 1996 to check for an extraordinary intake.
  6. Air movements
    Correlate Campinas tower logs and manifests with ESA gate logs and FAB records, then resubmit a narrowed U.S. records request keyed to Brazilian tail numbers and times. 

Policy and culture

Regardless of one’s conclusion, Varginha altered the municipal identity. Tourism assets in the region adopt the imagery of a stylized being and a flying disc water tower anchors the city center. National outlets note the economic and symbolic aftermath, the very definition of a UAP event entering civic narrative. (Terra Avista)

The case also provides a rare Latin American example of formal military inquiry into a civilian UAP event with lasting public access to the filing’s metadata and cover imagery.  The ARQUIMEDES pages for IPM 18/1997 and its two volumes are credible anchors for anyone studying official reaction and the mechanics of military law in a contested UAP setting. (Arquimedes)

Implications if the core claims prove accurate

  1. Biosecurity and medicine
    A sick or chemically contaminated non-human organism interacting at close range with humans and animals would place new responsibilities on municipal responders and hospitals. Protocols for unknown pathogens or exudates would need to be written into civil defense manuals.
  2. Interagency transparency
    The persistence of this story, including a congressional information request well over a decade later, shows that secrecy erodes trust. If official units did respond to an unusual biological event, documented joint protocols would now be a public good. (Portal da Câmara dos Deputados)
  3. Comparative casework
    The multi-sensor ideal in UAP research is not present here in the public record. There is testimony, official denials, and a death that invites speculation. If a craft came down, then data holdings in radar or space surveillance would become the key. If not, Varginha becomes an instructive case about the speed of rumor in a mid-nineties media environment and the need for rapid technical transparency.

Bottom line assessment

The record contains three strong elements. 

First, early mainstream reporting fixed the core testimony quickly, which reduces the chance of later drift. 

Second, there is an uncommon level of official reaction archived under IPM 18/1997, which signals that the Army took the social impact seriously enough to investigate and to publish a conclusion. 

Third, there is a medical death that is real and proximate to the event window, yet not clearly linked in the public biomedical record. Together with the witnesses testimonies these elements keep Varginha in the foreground of UAP case studies.

At the same time, both the Army’s conclusions and the absence of public forensic artifacts weigh heavily. Without logs, tissue, or device level data, the case rests on human testimony, institutional statements, and the energy around them. 

The data-first posture compels us to say this: Varginha remains disputed but non trivial. A compelling case in witness testimonies, the Varginha Incident could transform into probable if more corroborating credible witnesses come forward or a paper trail is found.

Ignore it, and you ignore one of the most informative stress tests of how institutions, media, and citizens react when a non standard event appears to happen in the open.

References

Globo, Fantástico: case segment from February 1996, archived by Globoplay and summarized by Memória Globo. (Globoplay)

Superior Military Court ARQUIMEDES portal, listing for IPM 18/1997 and links to the two digitized volumes. (Arquimedes)

IstoÉ, “A história oficial do ET de Varginha,” summarizing Army conclusions including the “Mudinho” hypothesis. (IstoÉ)

VEJA, “O mistério que ronda os céus de Varginha completa 15 anos,” noting truck maintenance documentation cited by the Army. (VEJA)

The Wall Street Journal, “Tale of Stinky Extraterrestrials Stirs Up UFO Crowd in Brazil,” June 1996. (Wall Street Journal)

Brazilian Chamber of Deputies, Request for Information regarding military or police involvement and any captured beings. (Portal da Câmara dos Deputados)

James Fox, Moment of Contact distribution page and synopsis, and long form podcast discussions that expand on masked testimony. (YouTube)

TV Alterosa twenty year retrospective documentary on the Varginha case. (YouTube)

Coverage and interviews concerning the death of Corporal Marco Eli Chereze. (MD-M09)

Coulthart, R. (Host). (2025, Nov). Reality Check segment with James Fox on new Varginha witnesses [Video]. NewsNation/YouTube. (YouTube)

CNN Brasil. (2025, Nov 14). Neurologista diz que viu ET de Varginha em hospital; relato viraliza. (CNN Brasil)

Folha do Estado. (2025, Nov 14). Médico neurologista diz que viu ET de Varginha em hospital. (Folha do Estado)

Wikipedia contributors. (2025). Varginha UFO incident. Summary of the 2010 Army findings and “Mudinho” explanation. (Wikipedia)

Case research method in brief

  1. Primary contemporaneous media from Brazil, including Globo’s prime-time news magazine Fantástico, which introduced the case nationally in early February 1996 and archived the segment with credits, runtime, and production notes. (Globoplay)
  2. Official actions and records from the Brazilian Army’s Escola de Sargentos das Armas, which opened a fact-finding review in May 1996 and a formal military police inquiry in early 1997, archived as IPM 18/1997 and now listed with metadata and linked images by the Superior Military Court’s ARQUIMEDES portal. (Arquimedes)
  3. Independent and national press that summarized or criticized those official findings, including IstoÉ and VEJA, and the international coverage by The Wall Street Journal. (IstoÉ)
  4. Documentary and podcast record centered on James Fox’s Moment of Contact, with distribution pages and long form interviews that contain new testimony and names masked in the film. (YouTube)
  5. Legislative references where members of Brazil’s Congress sought clarifications years later. (Portal da Câmara dos Deputados)
  6. James Fox’s November 2025 case witnesses revelations and filmed testimony shed light into what happened in the hospital and after the incident. (News Nation)

Claims Taxonomy

Verified

  • Existence of Army Military Police Inquiry 18/1997 into the case, with two volumes archived by the Superior Military Court and accessible metadata and images. (Arquimedes)
  • National broadcast coverage by Globo’s Fantástico in early February 1996 with interviews of the three women. (Globoplay)
  • Death of Corporal Marco Eli Chereze in mid February 1996 from generalized infection following a minor procedure, as reported by Brazilian outlets and in a long TV interview with his physician. (MD-M09)

Probable

  • Presence of Army trucks in the city that week, with at least part of the movement explained by scheduled maintenance, according to VEJA’s summary of the official findings. (VEJA)
  • Multiple independent civilians reporting low altitude or ground-level anomalies across a two day window, consolidated in national coverage and later documentaries. (Globoplay)
  • Distressed cylindrical craft on 13 January and a separate disc performing a methodical grid search on 20 January, on multi‑witness convergence absent sensor data.
  • Hospital encounter with a living non‑human per Dr. Ítalo Venturelli’s named 2025 testimony, pending corroboration from logs or co‑witness medical staff. (YouTube)

Disputed

  • Capture or custody of a living non human being by city or Army units. The Army denies; masked and on-record witnesses in the modern documentary assert it happened. (Arquimedes)
  • The identity of the being seen by the three women. The Army posits a misidentified local man called “Mudinho,” while the witnesses have rejected that explanation for nearly three decades. (IstoÉ)
  • Etiology of Marco Eli Chereze’s fatal infection. Official sepsis vs. pathologists’ description of unprecedented bacterial behavior. Requires primary lab records.
  • Claims that United States forces took custody of bodies or a craft via a cargo plane. This appears in media summaries and interviews but lacks documentary confirmation in Brazilian or United States archives released to date. (Examiner News)

Legend

  • Religious framings by witnesses, including “devil‑like” and “angel‑like.” Useful for interpretation but not probative.

Misidentification

  • The Army’s official narrative yes, but as an analytical category rather than a conclusion. The “Mudinho” explanation is asserted by officialdom; however, no controlled reconstruction has been published that tests visibility, distance, lighting, and stress reactions of the witnesses against that hypothesis. (IstoÉ)

Speculation labels

Hypothesis

  • A low energy vehicle or pod descended near Varginha and at least one occupant survived temporarily, injured and disoriented, which explains the crouched posture and smell. This could also align with staggered retrieval operations that civilians interpreted as military blockades.
  • The disc’s grid pattern reflects a search‑and‑rescue operation.

Witness interpretation

  • The three women reported the being looked frightened and weak. They saw eyes as glowing red and skin as wet and brown. They interpreted it as a living creature not a man in distress. (Globoplay)
  • Venturelli’s description of telepathic calm and “angelic” presence reflects phenomenology under acute stress.

Researcher opinion

  • The timing of vehicle movements, the hospital stories, and the soldier’s death form a pattern that suggests an unusual biohazard event followed by rapid military and hospital responses. This is the view presented in Moment of Contact and related interviews. It is a narrative synthesis, not a laboratory proof. (YouTube)
  • Potential U.S. custody via Campinas landing. All three require documents or sensor corroboration. 

SEO keywords

Varginha UAP case, Brazil non human intelligence, Moment of Contact James Fox, Varginha 1996 witnesses, ESA IPM 18 1997 archive, Humanitas Hospital Varginha, Marco Eli Chereze death, Jardim Andere encounter, Brazilian Army Varginha inquiry, UAP in Latin America, Varginha 1996, Varginha incident, Brazil UAP case, Dr. Ítalo Venturelli, Marco Eli Chereze, James Fox Moment of Contact, ESA Três Corações, Campinas USAF landing, Brazilian Army IPM 18/1997, ammonia odor Varginha, non human biologics Brazil, hospital testimony Varginha

Glossary of Terms

0-9
A
AARO
All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office
AATIP
Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program
AAWSAP
Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program
B
C
CSETI
Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence
CUFOS
Center for UFO Studies
D
DoD
Department of Defense, now Department of War
DoW
Department of War, ex-Department of Defense
E
F
FAA
Federal Aviation Administration
FOIA
Freedom of Information Act
G
H
I
IC
Intelligence Community – A group of 18 U.S. government intelligence agencies, such as the FBI, NSA, and CIA, that contribute to intelligence on subjects including UAP analysis.
J
K
L
M
MUFON
Mutual UFO Network
N
NASA
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NHI
Non-Human Intelligence
NICAP
National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena
O
ODNI
Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Overton Window
A political framework describing the range of policies considered acceptable or respectable within mainstream public discourse at a given time.
P
PIREPs
Pilot Reports
Q
R
S
SCU
Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies
T
U
UAP
Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
UAPTF
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force
UFO
Unidentified Flying Object
V
W
X
Y
Z