Why near-death experiences, altered states of consciousness, and UAP encounter reports keep circling the same forbidden territory.
A recent Mindfield Bulletin editorial floated a provocative idea: that UAP may function as a kind of “gatekeeper” phenomenon, pushing science toward a harder confrontation with consciousness itself. That claim is speculative, not settled science. But the provocation lands because an awkward pattern has become harder to ignore. Across near-death experiences, psychedelic and trance research, sleep-paralysis studies, and parts of the UAP experiencer literature, the same motifs keep recurring: bright light, sensed presence, disembodiment, time distortion, telepathic certainty, an encounter that feels “more real than real,” and a life that does not quite return to its previous shape afterward. (Mindfield Bulletin)
That does not mean all these experiences have the same cause. It does not prove survival after death. It does not prove non-human intelligence. It does not prove that every strange night terror or anomalous sighting is a portal into some deeper reality. What it does suggest is more disciplined and, in some ways, more unsettling: human consciousness seems to have a repeatable repertoire for what happens when the ordinary boundary conditions of selfhood begin to fail. Different literatures describe that repertoire in different languages, but the phenomenology keeps rhyming.
For decades, institutions have kept these domains in separate rooms. Neurology handles cardiac arrest survivors. Psychiatry handles dissociation, trauma, and hallucination-prone states. Religious studies handles mystical trance. Ufology, often exiled from respectable inquiry, handles anomalous encounter reports. But when you lay the testimony side by side, the bureaucratic walls look artificial. The deepest commonality is not belief. It is structure: a disruption of the ordinary model of self, followed by a struggle to decide what, exactly, happened. (ORBi)
The near-death state is wider than the deathbed
Near-death experiences are no longer just campfire material for television documentaries. A major 2025 Nature Reviews Neurology paper defined NDEs as episodes of disconnected consciousness that typically arise in situations of actual or potential physical threat, or states perceived by the brain as such. The review points to classic features that have been reported since the nineteenth century and systematized in modern research: bright light, tunnel sensations, peace, voices, altered time, and out-of-body experiences. It also notes that prevalence estimates vary by context, including roughly 3% after traumatic brain injury, 15% after prolonged ICU stay, and 10–23% after cardiac arrest.
Then comes the first crack in the old materialist caricature. The same review argues that experiences closely resembling NDEs also occur outside narrowly defined life-threatening events: during syncope, near-miss accidents, drug states, and other acute threat contexts. In fact, the authors say these “near-death-like” experiences may be as common as classic NDEs, suggesting that the crucial variable is not simply whether the body is objectively dying, but how the brain registers threat and launches a cascade of physiological and psychological responses. That is a big shift. It moves the NDE from the metaphysical margins into the comparative study of altered consciousness.
The same review is careful about what counts as explanation. It sets dualist theories aside because its purpose is neuroscientific, then builds a model out of impaired cerebral blood flow, hypoxia, hypercapnia, acidosis, increased neuronal excitability, and dysregulation of key neurotransmitter systems. At the same time, the paper explicitly says NDE content is not reducible to chemistry alone. It distinguishes between perception-related features and interpretive features, and notes that interpretation can be shaped by pre-existing personal, social, and cultural factors. In other words, the brain may generate the opening, but the mind and its world furnish part of the meaning.
That tension matters because it is exactly where altered-state research and experiencer research begin to overlap. If an NDE is generated through a cascade of physiology and shaped by top-down processes, then comparison with psychedelics, trance, dissociation, and anomalous encounter reports stops looking fringe and starts looking methodologically necessary. The question shifts from “Which one is real?” to “What common architecture produces these recurring forms of experience?” (ORBi)
Prospective hospital work has pushed that question into mainstream medicine. The AWARE-II multicenter study, published in 2023, explicitly examined consciousness and electrocortical biomarkers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Whether one agrees with every interpretation attached to that work, its significance is plain: modern medicine now treats awareness during cardiac arrest as something that can be studied empirically rather than dismissed as folklore. That alone marks a cultural and scientific turn. (PubMed)
What happens after the “return” is where the story gets interesting
The most interesting part of an NDE may not be the event itself. It may be the aftermath. The 2025 paper “Outside the Matrix: Dreaming After Near-Death Experiences” begins from a now-familiar finding: NDEs are associated with long-term psychophysical aftereffects, including changes in sleep and dreaming. In a qualitative study of 13 participants, the authors found more vivid dreams, stronger dream recall, more lucid dreaming, and lasting changes in how people understood both dreaming and reality itself. Their conclusion was not that dreams became random aftershocks of trauma, but that post-NDE dream life often appeared to continue themes already present in the NDE state. (ResearchGate)
A 2024 quantitative study sharpened that point. Comparing 138 NDE survivors with people who had faced life-threatening events without an NDE and with people who had never come close to death, the researchers found the NDE group reported significantly more lucid dreams, more creative and problem-solving dreams, more precognitive dreams, and more out-of-body experiences during sleep than either comparison group. Crucially, those dream differences appeared to be associated more strongly with the NDE itself than with trauma symptoms. That is a serious result because it suggests the near-death state may alter a person’s ongoing relationship to consciousness, not merely frighten them. (Massey Research Online)
The qualitative follow-up went even further into territory polite science usually avoids. Participants described what the authors organized into three themes: intensified non-ordinary dreaming, dysphoric dreams that carried the emotional or symbolic residue of the near-death event, and dreams that felt like sources of guidance or intelligence in their own right. Some participants reported dreams involving the deceased, perceived precognition, and experiences the paper describes as “shared consciousness,” where the line between self and other seemed to blur. The authors repeatedly frame these as reports and interpretations, not confirmed paranormal facts. Even so, the phenomenological profile is striking: collapse of linear time, unstable body boundaries, vivid entity-like encounters, and a conviction that one has touched a layer of reality more coherent than ordinary waking life. (ResearchGate)
A fair inference from these studies is that the NDE is not simply a dramatic hallucination that ends when circulation resumes. For many experiencers, it appears to function more like a state-change event: an episode after which dreams, sleep, identity, and the felt structure of reality all become more porous. That does not settle ontology. It does, however, widen the comparison set. Once the post-NDE dream life starts to look like lucid dreaming, dissociation, mystical cognition, and anomalous encounter narratives, the old disciplinary silos become hard to defend. (Massey Research Online)
Altered states are not a sideshow to consciousness. They are the test case.
A 2025 paper in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science made an argument that should be obvious but rarely is: altered states of consciousness are not one exotic thing. They are a family of mental states that differ from ordinary waking consciousness in awareness, perception, cognition, identity, and emotional organization, and they can arise voluntarily or involuntarily through psychedelics, chanting, dancing, meditation, prayer, hypnosis, trauma, and dissociation. If that sounds broad, it is. The point is that modern culture has treated these states as peripheral when they may actually be among the clearest windows into how consciousness is built and rebuilt.
That same paper is especially useful because it refuses a false choice between brain and culture. It argues that neurophysiology matters, but so do social expectancy, symbolic frameworks, and personal beliefs. In the paper’s case study of spirit possession, a trance can be felt as pathology in one context, revelation in another, and therapy in a third. The experience may involve dissociation, amnesia, ego loosening, or dramatic shifts in identity, yet its meaning and aftermath are powerfully shaped by the surrounding culture. The lesson extends beyond possession rituals. Consciousness does not come to us raw. It arrives already interpreted. (ResearchGate)
That is exactly why the same kinds of internal events can take radically different narrative forms. In a hospital, a person may report a tunnel, a boundary, a light, a deceased relative, or a “point of no return.” In a religious ritual, similar features may be named as spirit contact or divine union. In a bedroom during sleep paralysis, the experience may be a malign presence, an intruder, or an abduction. In a UAP encounter, it may be telepathic contact with an intelligence associated with anomalous lights. The underlying claim here is not that all these labels are interchangeable. It is that human beings appear to map unusual states through the interpretive tools available to them. (ORBi)
That interpretive layer is often treated by skeptics as proof that the experience is “merely” psychological. But that is too cheap. The 2025 altered-state paper argues that these states can also carry therapeutic value, facilitate emotional release, disrupt rigid patterns of selfhood, and help people process trauma. The experience can be brain-based and still be life-defining. Mechanism does not cancel significance. That point will matter later, because it is exactly where UAP experiencer narratives have been mishandled from both sides: debunkers often ignore impact, while believers often leap from impact to cosmic certainty. (ResearchGate)
The UAP witness as a consciousness problem
The most scientifically useful UAP literature is often the least sensational. One of the clearest papers remains a 2008 Cortex study by Christopher French and colleagues on the psychology of alien contact experiences. In that sample, experiencers scored higher than controls on dissociativity, absorption, paranormal belief, paranormal experience, self-reported psychic ability, fantasy proneness, tendency to hallucinate, and self-reported sleep paralysis. That finding is often waved around as a debunking cudgel. It should not be. What it actually shows is that some people who report anomalous encounters also appear more dispositionally open, or vulnerable, to states in which ordinary reality boundaries loosen.
Absorption matters here. High-absorption individuals tend to become deeply immersed in inner and outer experience. In adjacent literature cited alongside the French study, absorption is linked to intense feelings of presence, transcendence, vivid prayer experiences, mystical states, and strong immersion even in virtual environments. That does not mean an absorbed person is confused. It means the threshold at which imagination, sensation, belief, and anomaly begin to braid together may be lower or more permeable. In the study of NDEs and altered states, that kind of permeability is not a fringe variable. It is central.
The bridge most likely to irritate both camps is sleep paralysis. French and colleagues note that sleep paralysis is a liminal state between sleep and wakefulness in which people may feel unable to move while also experiencing a strong sensed presence, visual or auditory hallucinations, intense fear, breathing difficulty, and even out-of-body-like sensations. They further note that many commentators have argued this state can seed beliefs about alien abduction, especially when later memory work or suggestive techniques are applied. That is a powerful explanatory candidate for some encounter narratives. Not all, but some. (ScienceDirect)
Still, reducing the entire UAP experiencer domain to sleep paralysis is no better than reducing all NDEs to oxygen deprivation and calling the matter closed. A 2023 Cambridge study surveying 245 people about UAP, including 93 direct witnesses, found a clear psychological impact on witnesses and described a transformative effect alongside what the authors called a benign, non-pathological deep engagement with the topic. This “UAP deep psychological engagement triad” involved thinking about the topic daily, recognizing one’s interest in it, and feeling a need to talk about it – without necessarily falling apart socially or occupationally. That looks less like simple delusion than like an encounter that reorganizes attention and meaning.
The same Cambridge paper is careful not to overclaim. It does not prove what witnesses saw. It does not establish whether certain psychological profiles predate the event or arise because of it. But it does argue that witnesses are not well described by a crude psychopathology model. In the broader respondent pool, participants tended to describe themselves as more spiritual than religious and more intuitive than strictly rational, while the witness effect itself was characterized as transformative rather than merely pathological. Again, the pattern is familiar: a destabilizing event followed by a persistent change in worldview. (Cambridge University Press & Assessment)
Then there is the emerging but still weak medical literature on UAP encounter effects. A 2025 review in Matrix Science Medica explicitly says direct evidence is limited and that much of the record is anecdotal. That caveat should stay in bold. Even so, the paper identifies recurring reports of fear, anxiety, PTSD-like symptoms, dissociation, insomnia, nightmares, sleep paralysis, dizziness, headaches, memory problems, confusion, concentration difficulty, and reduced executive function after close encounters. The authors discuss electromagnetic or radiation-based mechanisms as hypotheses, not established facts. The best way to read that paper is not as proof of exotic technology, but as evidence that some UAP encounter narratives include a recognizable neuropsychological aftermath. (ResearchGate)
This is the point where the investigative trail becomes genuinely interesting. Whatever the external status of UAP cases – misperception, aircraft, folklore, rare physical anomalies, or something more exotic – the human side of the encounter repeatedly presents as a consciousness event. Sleep changes. Memory becomes unstable or unusually vivid. The body can feel detached or violated. Ordinary categories no longer fit. The aftermath may include trauma, but also fascination, spiritual shift, ecological concern, or a sense that reality has become thinner and stranger than one was taught. That is not proof of a shared cause with NDEs. It is proof of a shared territory. (Cambridge University Press & Assessment)
The shared grammar: light, presence, telepathy, time, transformation
Look at the recurring motifs and the overlap becomes hard to dismiss as coincidence. In NDE research, bright light, voices, peace, altered time, and OBEs are canonical enough to appear in standardized scales and major review articles. In the French alien-contact sample, many experiencers reported direct contact with non-human beings and telepathic communication. In sleep paralysis, the sensed presence is so common it is practically diagnostic in the popular imagination. These are not identical experiences, but they share a common grammar: the self is no longer sealed inside ordinary space, and meaning arrives with a force that feels immediate rather than inferred. (ORBi)
Time is another convergence point. The Nature Reviews Neurology paper includes time distortion among standard NDE features. The 2024 within-subject comparison between NDEs and psychedelic experiences found time-perception changes in nearly all participants for both states, and strong overlap in mystical-type effects such as unity and spiritual significance. Where the two diverged was equally revealing: NDEs showed stronger disembodiment, while psychedelics showed stronger visual imagery. That is a subtle but important distinction. It suggests different routes can converge on similar meaning-rich states while still carrying distinct sensory signatures.
Reality attribution may be the most explosive overlap of all. In the same 2024 comparison, many participants judged both their NDEs and their psychedelic experiences as more real than daily life, with current reality attribution remaining especially strong for NDEs. That “more real than real” quality is not a side effect. It is one of the central reasons these experiences survive skepticism, reinterpretation, and time. The experiencer does not feel as though they had an unusual idea. They feel as though the world briefly disclosed a deeper layer of itself. Whether that intuition is metaphysically true is a different question. Psychologically, it is decisive. (OUP Academic)
Then there is the issue of shared consciousness and telepathic certainty. The post-NDE dreaming paper reported participants who felt the line between self and other blur, as though they were temporarily merged with another mind or inhabiting a wider field of awareness. Some UAP encounter reports, including those discussed in the French study and in more speculative consciousness-oriented essays, likewise involve telepathic contact rather than ordinary speech. The scientific status of those interpretations remains contested. But the structural similarity is undeniable: information is experienced as arriving directly, without the normal mediation of language or sense data. (ResearchGate)
And then comes the aftereffect, the one pattern skeptics often underplay and believers often overread. NDE studies describe long-term changes in identity, spirituality, dream life, and perceptions of reality. The Cambridge UAP witness study describes transformation and lasting engagement. Survey-based UAP contact literature, though methodologically weaker and often self-selected, repeatedly reports changes in worldview, spirituality, and perceived sensitivity after encounters. Across domains, the event is less like a discrete incident than like a hinge. Something in the person’s model of reality swings open and does not fully close again. (ResearchGate)
This is why comparisons between NDEs and UAP phenomenology provoke such strong reactions. For committed materialists, the overlap can sound like contamination: too much meaning, too many symbols, too much subjectivity. For committed believers, a naturalistic comparison can feel reductive or disrespectful. But that is precisely what makes the overlap worth studying. It sits in the narrow space where neuroscience, trauma theory, anthropology, and anomaly all become relevant at once. It is not a comfortable space. It is, however, where the evidence points. (Mindfield Bulletin)
Maybe the answer lies within us – as we delve into the more finite and hidden worlds of material reality, we dive deeper into the mind and inner workings of experience.
Unlocking the Gate to UAP and Consciousness by Anastasia Wasko and Jacob W. Glazier – Mindfield Bulletin – June 13, 2025
Similarity is a clue, not a verdict
The strongest skeptical interpretation is straightforward: the brain has a limited set of ways to represent overwhelming liminality. Threat, hypoxia, REM intrusion, dissociation, psychedelics, and trance may all destabilize predictive models of body, time, and self, producing recurring motifs such as disembodiment, presence, light, unity, and hyper-reality. On this view, shared phenomenology does not imply a shared external source. It implies a shared nervous system under stress or alteration. The current neuroscience of NDEs, the sleep-paralysis literature, and the altered-state framework all support at least part of that argument. (ORBi)
The strongest non-reductive interpretation makes a different move. It notes that biology may explain how the door opens without settling what, if anything, lies beyond it. The 2025 NDE dreaming paper openly entertains participants’ sense that post-NDE dreaming involved a collapse of ordinary time and access to something like collective consciousness; the Mindfield editorial similarly frames UAP as potentially opening a route toward post-materialist models of mind. These are not consensus scientific conclusions. They are interpretive proposals – bold ones, sometimes too bold. But they exist because the experiences themselves resist neat containment inside current categories. (ResearchGate)
The honest position, at least for now, is narrower and more durable. We do not know whether NDEs reveal consciousness surviving bodily crisis, whether some altered states tune perception toward otherwise hidden realities, or whether some UAP encounter narratives involve genuinely external intelligences interacting with human consciousness. What we do know is that people across these literatures repeatedly describe comparable disruptions of selfhood and reality attribution, and that these experiences often have measurable or at least reportable long-term consequences. That is enough to justify an integrated research program, even if it is not enough to justify a grand metaphysical verdict.
And that research program needs to be better than what exists now. NDE science has advanced because it includes prospective hospital studies, standardized scales, and increasingly sophisticated neuroscientific modeling. By contrast, UAP experiencer research is still dominated by retrospective surveys, self-selected samples, anecdotal medical claims, and stigma-heavy conditions that discourage formal reporting. The 2025 neurological review on UAP effects explicitly admits the evidence base is thin and largely testimonial. The next serious step would be cross-domain work: longitudinal designs, standardized phenomenology, sleep and trauma assessment, EEG or neuroimaging where feasible, and careful tracking of cultural meaning-making instead of pretending it is mere noise. (ORBi)
A mature science of these experiences would also stop forcing a false choice between pathology and revelation. Some people are traumatized by what they report. Some are transformed in ways they consider positive. Some are both. The altered-state literature makes clear that dissociation can be a coping response and that altered states can be therapeutically meaningful. The NDE literature shows both transcendent and dysphoric aftermaths. The UAP literature shows both distress and non-pathological engagement. The old impulse to sort every extraordinary report into “true supernatural event” or “mere disorder” is not just lazy. It is empirically inadequate. (ResearchGate)
Conclusion
In the end, the convergence between near-death experiences, altered states, and UAP experiencer phenomenology does not tell a simple story. It tells a difficult one. It suggests that modern people keep wandering into a borderland where the categories of neurology, religion, trauma, dream, and anomaly stop holding cleanly. Some enter through cardiac arrest. Some through meditation, psychedelics, or sleep paralysis. Some through an event in the sky, or an event they believe came from the sky. But once there, many report the same elemental grammar: light, presence, boundary loss, distorted time, overwhelming meaning, and an afterward that makes the old world look flatter than before.
That may be the real investigative finding hiding beneath the sensational headlines. The mystery is not only what these people saw. It is what kind of creature the human being must be for such different triggers to produce such similar worlds. Science has not solved that question. But the pattern is now visible enough that pretending not to see it has become its own kind of dogma.
Claims Taxonomy
Verified
- Near-death experiences (NDEs) present recurring phenomenological features such as bright light, out-of-body experiences, and time distortion across cultures and studies.
- NDEs can occur in both life-threatening and non-life-threatening contexts, including syncope and perceived danger states.
- Altered states of consciousness can be induced through multiple pathways, including physiological stress, psychedelics, meditation, and dissociation.
- Sleep paralysis is associated with sensed presence, immobility, and vivid hallucination-like experiences.
- UAP witnesses report measurable psychological impact, including lasting changes in worldview and attention patterns.
- Post-NDE individuals report long-term changes in dreaming, including increased lucidity and vividness.
Probable
- There are consistent phenomenological overlaps between NDEs, altered states, and UAP experiencer reports (e.g., presence, telepathic communication, altered time perception).
- Individual predispositions such as absorption and dissociative tendency may increase likelihood of reporting anomalous experiences.
- The brain plays a central role in generating or mediating these experiences through physiological and neurochemical processes.
- Cultural, psychological, and belief frameworks shape how these experiences are interpreted and remembered.
- UAP encounters, regardless of origin, may function as transformative psychological events for experiencers.
Disputed
- Whether NDEs represent actual consciousness independent of brain function versus internally generated experiences.
- Whether UAP encounters involve external non-human intelligence interacting with human consciousness.
- Claims of telepathic communication or shared consciousness during anomalous experiences.
- Reports of precognition or non-linear time perception as objective phenomena rather than subjective interpretations.
Misidentification
- Some UAP encounters may be attributable to sleep paralysis, hypnagogic hallucinations, or known psychological states.
- Certain anomalous experiences may be misinterpreted natural phenomena or internally generated perceptual events.
Legend
- Broad narratives that universally link all NDEs or UAP encounters to a single metaphysical or extraterrestrial explanation.
Hoax
- No direct evidence in this article suggests deliberate fabrication; however, hoaxes exist historically within UAP reporting and must be considered in broader analysis.
Speculation Labels
Hypothesis
- NDEs, altered states, and UAP encounters may emerge from a shared underlying architecture of consciousness under boundary disruption.
- The brain may act as a filter, transducer, or mediator rather than a generator of consciousness, with altered states reducing this filtering.
- UAP phenomena may interact with human perception in ways that trigger or amplify altered states of consciousness.
Witness Interpretation
- Experiencers interpret encounters as interactions with non-human intelligence, spiritual entities, or a broader field of consciousness.
- Many individuals report these experiences as “more real than real,” assigning them ontological significance beyond ordinary perception.
- Post-experience changes in worldview are often interpreted as evidence of accessing a deeper or hidden layer of reality.
Researcher Opinion
- Some researchers argue that studying UAP requires integrating consciousness research rather than treating it purely as a physical (nuts-and-bolts) phenomenon.
- There is growing support for interdisciplinary frameworks combining neuroscience, psychology, and cultural analysis.
- Certain scholars suggest that anomalous experiences challenge strictly materialist models of mind, though this remains contested.
References
AWARE-II Study Investigators. (2023). Consciousness and awareness during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: AWARE-II study. Resuscitation, 191, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109118
French, C. C., Santomauro, J., Hamilton, V., Fox, R., & Thalbourne, M. A. (2008). Psychological aspects of the alien contact experience. Cortex, 44(10), 1387–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.11.011
Greyson, B., Holden, J. M., & van Lommel, P. (2024). Near-death experiences and altered states of consciousness: A comparative analysis. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2024(1), niae033. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niae033
Martial, C., Cassol, H., Antonopoulos, G., et al. (2025). Near-death experiences: A multidisciplinary perspective. Nature Reviews Neurology, 21, 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01072-z
Mindfield Bulletin Editorial Board. (2026). Unlocking the gate to UAP and consciousness. Mindfield Bulletin. https://mindfieldbulletin.org/editorial-unlocking-the-gate-to-uap-and-consciousness/
Mosley, T., & Smith, J. (2025). Outside the matrix: Dreaming after near-death experiences. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 32(4), 55–78.
Nixon, E., et al. (2024). Dream characteristics in near-death experiencers: A comparative study. Dreaming, 34(2), 89–104.
Pereira, A., & Moreira-Almeida, A. (2025). A fragmented mind: Altered states of consciousness and spirit possession between rituals and therapy. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 59(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-025-09789-0
Moscote-Salazar, L. R., et al (2025). Neurological effects of encounters with unidentified aerial phenomena. Matrix Science Medica, 9(3), 145–158. https://discovery.researcher.life/article/neurological-effects-of-encounters-with-unidentified-aerial-phenomena/f965facd9a513668a2769f204167a8ed
Williams, L., et al. (2023). Psychological aspects in unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) witnesses. International Journal of Astrobiology, 22(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147355042300015X
Internal crosslinks
SEO Keywords
Near-death experiences (NDE), UAP consciousness connection, altered states of consciousness, UAP experiencer phenomenon, consciousness and UAP, NDE research science, UFO experiencer psychology, anomalous experiences consciousness, out-of-body experience science, sleep paralysis and alien encounters, lucid dreaming after near-death experience, telepathy in UAP encounters, neuroscience of consciousness, dissociation and anomalous perception, mystical experiences research, human consciousness transformation, similarities between near-death experiences and UFO encounters, scientific explanation for altered states of consciousness, how UAP experiences affect the brain and psychology, post near-death experience changes in perception and dreams, are UFO encounters linked to consciousness states, neurological effects of UAP encounters, comparison between psychedelics and near-death experiences, what happens to consciousness during near-death experiences, human perception and reality, non-ordinary states of awareness, consciousness research frontier, anomalous cognition, mind-brain relationship, reality perception shifts, transformative experiences, ontology of consciousness