1. Home
  2. Knowledge Base
  3. B - Government Programs
  4. 09. AAWSAP and AATIP
  5. Origins of AATIP/AAWSAP: Programs & DIRDs

Origins of AATIP/AAWSAP: Programs & DIRDs

Born in 2008 at the Defense Intelligence Agency, AAWSAP set out to scan the horizon for far-term aerospace threats and radical technologies. Funded at roughly $22 million and executed by Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies, it produced thirty-eight Defense Intelligence Reference Documents, literature-rich surveys on metamaterials, warp metrics, wormholes, directed energy, bioeffects, and cockpit design. Inside the paperwork, the public label AATIP emerged, later used loosely for a small, unfunded circle that continued to look at UAP cases after the contract ended.

When Senator Harry Reid asked to vault the effort into a restricted Special Access Program, Pentagon leadership declined, judging the outputs exploratory, not sensitive breakthroughs. The program closed in 2012, leaving behind ambitious papers, scattered UAP casework, and a persistent branding confusion. A proposed revival, “KONA BLUE,” with crash-retrieval aspirations, never launched.

In 2017–2020 the Navy videos pushed UAP into headlines and Congress. Formal successors followed: the UAP Task Force and then AARO, which now says it has found no verified evidence of off-world technology while acknowledging unresolved cases. The lesson of AAWSAP/AATIP is stark: big questions demand better data, structured collection, multi-sensor corroboration, and transparent, reproducible analysis. Future efforts should fund sensors, open archives, and independent statistical review teams.

Executive Summary

  • Program of record: AAWSAP was a Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) program funded via Congressional direction beginning FY2008/2009 to study far-term aerospace threats and revolutionary technologies. It was managed under DIA and executed under contract by Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS). Contract number: HHM402-08-C-0072 (solicitation HHM402-08-R-0211). 
  • AATIP vs. AAWSAP: “AATIP” appears interchangeably on some documents but AATIP was not an official DoD program of record; after AAWSAP’s termination, “AATIP” became a moniker used informally by a small internal community to review UAP cases without dedicated budget. (U.S. Department of Defense)
  • Funding: Senate-directed appropriations totaled about $22M across FY2008 and FY2010 lines (e.g., $10M initial earmark in 2008 supplemental; $12M allocated for FY2010). 
  • Outputs: DIA transmitted to Congress a list of 38 deliverables known as DIRDs (Defense Intelligence Reference Documents) covering metamaterials, warp metrics, wormholes, cloaking, bioeffects, high-energy lasers, and more. (Intelligence Resource Program)
  • Termination: DoD leadership, following DIA review, declined a 2009 request from Sen. Harry Reid to elevate the effort to a Restricted Special Access Program; DIA judged the deliverables did not justify SAP protection. AAWSAP was ended in 2012 upon completion of deliverables. (U.S. Department of Defense)
  • Successors: Subsequent formal efforts: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) in 2020 and All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) from 2022 onward. (U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense)
  • Videos: DoD officially released three Navy UAP videos (2004, 2015) in 2020 to “clear up any misconceptions.” (U.S. Department of Defense)
  • Recent official synthesis: AARO’s Historical Record Report (2024) details AAWSAP/AATIP’s scope, notes paranormal lines of effort pursued by the contractor, documents the KONA BLUE proposal (not approved), and states AATIP was never an official DoD program. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Scope: This article maps what is documented about the U.S. government’s Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) and the related, later-publicized term AATIP; it catalogs known Defense Intelligence Reference Documents (DIRDs); and it summarizes origins, funding, outputs, controversies, and policy implications. Where possible, it cites declassified government documents and official releases. Where claims rest on testimony or non-government sources, they are clearly labeled in the Claims Taxonomy and Speculation sections at the end.

Origins: Why AAWSAP was created

  • Strategic intent: In 2008, at the direction of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other appropriators, DIA was tasked to “assess far-term foreign advanced aerospace threats” out to multiple decades, emphasizing “unconventional and revolutionary technologies.” 
  • Program stand-up: DIA established AAWSAP in 2009 and competitively solicited proposals (RFP HHM402-08-R-0211). The sole award went to BAASS (HHM402-08-C-0072, awarded 22 Sep 2008). (Defense Intelligence Agency)
  • Early deliverables & review: By Oct 2009, DIA had completed a quality review of FY09 deliverables and advised DoD leadership that Special Access Program protections were not justified. 
  • Naming confusion emerges: Across correspondence and internal references, AAWSAP and AATIP appeared interchangeably; however, AARO’s 2024 historical review clarifies that AAWSAP was the actual DIA program and AATIP later functioned as an informal nickname used by an unofficial working group after AAWSAP ended. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Funding

Appropriations & allocations (per DIA read-ahead and AARO report):

  • $10M earmark in July 2008 supplemental to start the DIA effort. 
  • $12M allocated for FY2010, for a total program envelope of roughly $22M across the period. 
  • Contract mechanics: AAWSAP ran as a DIA contract with BAASS, drawing on multiple subcontractors to author technical studies and related work products. 

Takeaway: The budget was small by defense-R&D standards but enough to task dozens of state-of-the-art literature surveys and speculative technology papers, the DIRDs, and to establish limited field-investigation and case-review activities. (Intelligence Resource Program)

What AAWSAP/AATIP produced

The DIRDs (Defense Intelligence Reference Documents) were a set of 38 papers transmitted to Congress, spanning propulsion, materials, energy, sensing, human factors, and directed energy. The official list (DIA to Congress, Jan 2018) names the titles and principal authors. Highlights include (titles per DIA): (Intelligence Resource Program)

  • Invisibility Cloaking (U. Leonhardt)
  • Traversable Wormholes, Stargates, and Negative Energy (E. Davis)
  • Advanced Space Propulsion Based on Vacuum (Spacetime Metric) Engineering (H. Puthoff)
  • Warp Drive, Dark Energy, and the Manipulation of Extra Dimensions (R. Obousy)
  • Field Effects on Biological Tissues (C. “Kit” Green)
  • Metamaterials for Aerospace Applications (G. Shvets)
  • Negative Mass Propulsion (F. Winterberg)
  • High-Frequency Gravitational Wave Communications (R. Baker)
  • State of the Art and Evolution of High Energy Laser Weapons (J. Albertine)

What a DIRD is: A Defense Intelligence Reference Document is essentially a survey/assessment aimed at informing defense warning and technology forecasting, in this case looking as far ahead as 2050 and beyond. According to AARO and FOIA records, these papers were exploratory, often unclassified/FOUO, and typically not peer-reviewed in the academic sense. (U.S. Department of Defense, Intelligence Resource Program)

Beyond the DIRDs:
AARO’s historical review indicates that, although UAP casework was not explicitly in the contract statement of work, AAWSAP nonetheless pursued UAP case reviews, interviews, revisiting Project BLUE BOOK cases, and explored paranormal reports at a Utah property (then owned by the contractor’s principal). AARO states DIA did not specifically authorize those paranormal lines of effort. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Official Navy UAP videos: While not an AAWSAP deliverable, the Navy FLIR1, GIMBAL, and GOFAST videos became emblematic of post-AAWSAP public attention. DoD officially released them in April 2020 to dispel confusion after prior unauthorized leaks. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Key documents & timeline

2008–2009

  • Sep 2008: DIA awards HHM402-08-C-0072 to BAASS (solicitation HHM402-08-R-0211). (Defense Intelligence Agency)
  • Jun 24, 2009: Senator Harry Reid asks DepSecDef William Lynn to place “AATIP/AAWSAP” under Restricted SAP with a bigoted list; intent: protect methodologies, personnel, and potential exotic tech applications (Reid letter included as attachment). The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence James R. Clapper recommends against SAP status. 
  • Oct–Nov 2009: DIA completes a quality review and formally advises no SAP protection warranted given unclassified/basic-science nature of deliverables to date. 

2010–2012

  • FY2010: Additional $12M allocated; work continues; deliverables expand. 
  • 2012: Program terminated upon completion of deliverables, citing concerns and lack of justification to continue under DIA. (U.S. Department of Defense)

2017–2020

2022–present

Program structure

Contract model: AAWSAP’s day-to-day work was largely executed by BAASS with academic and private-sector subcontractors and subject-matter experts producing the DIRDs and related analyses. DIA oversaw the contract via a program manager within the Defense Warning Office. (The FOIA packet shows routine contract modifications and compliance status.) (Defense Intelligence Agency)

Topic coverage: The contract’s statement of work prioritized 12 technical areas (lift, propulsion, control, power generation, “spatial/temporal translation,” materials, structures, signature reduction, human interface, human effects, armament). The DIRD set mirrors these categories. (Intelligence Resource Program)

UAP casework & anomalous research: AARO’s 2024 review states that AAWSAP did conduct UAP-related reviews and interviews and undertook paranormal lines of effort, including work at a Utah ranch location, not explicitly authorized in the DIA statement of work. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Outcomes

  1. A durable catalog of high-speculation aerospace concepts (DIRDs) to inform defense warning and technology forecasting. These include advanced propulsion concepts (e.g., metric engineering, aneutronic fusion), low-observability (e.g., metamaterials, cloaking), human-systems (e.g., cognitive limits, bio-sensors), and directed-energy assessments. (Intelligence Resource Program)
  2. Increased UAP attention across DoD/IC: Though AAWSAP ended in 2012, the public disclosure in 2017 helped catalyze the creation of UAPTF and then AARO, moving UAP from ad-hoc inquiry to standardized reporting and cross-agency synchronization. (U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense)
  3. Policy precedent: The 2009 SAP-elevation request and formal DoD denial created a paper trail clarifying what types of deliverables warrant enhanced protection, useful precedent for future “breakthrough science” contracts. 
  4. Public evidence releases: The 2020 DoD release of three Navy UAP videos acknowledged authentic, unresolved sensor captures, without endorsing a specific origin, and set a baseline for data transparency. (U.S. Department of Defense)
  5. AARO findings (to date): AARO’s 2024 history asserts that AAWSAP’s work was largely exploratory; that some activity diverged into paranormal topics; and that claims of off-world craft and reverse-engineering programs lacked corroboration in verifiable government records. (This is the current official position; it does not preclude future evidence.) (U.S. Department of Defense)

Controversies

AATIP’s status and leadership

  • Issue: Was AATIP a formal program with a director, or an informal moniker used by a small group?
  • Official record: AARO’s 2024 report states AATIP was never an official DoD program, whereas AAWSAP was. After AAWSAP ended, “AATIP” labeled an unofficial community of interest that pursued UAP cases as collateral duties (no billets/budget). (U.S. Department of Defense)
  • Implication: Media shorthand sometimes conflated AAWSAP (program/contract) and AATIP (informal label). The distinction matters for authority, records retention, and deliverables.

The scope of contractor work

  • Issue: Did DIA authorize paranormal research lines, including Skinwalker Ranch-adjacent investigations and “human consciousness anomalies”?
  • Official record: AARO states DIA did not seek nor specifically authorize those lines, although a DIA employee managed the contract and AAWSAP pursued them. (U.S. Department of Defense)

The 2009 SAP request

  • Issue: Was AAWSAP’s work so sensitive that it required Restricted SAP with a bigoted list?
  • Official record: The Reid letter asked for SAP elevation; USD(I) James R. Clapper recommended against establishing a SAP after DIA judged the deliverables as basic research with insufficient national-security sensitivity at that time. 

“KONA BLUE”

  • Issue: A proposed post-AAWSAP initiative allegedly aimed at crash retrieval, reverse engineering, and continued paranormal research under DHS auspices.
  • Official record: AARO documents KONA BLUE as a Prospective SAP request that was never approved and no material was transferred. (U.S. Department of Defense)

What the videos show

  • Issue: The 2004 and 2015 Navy videos are authentic; interpretations vary widely.
  • Official record: DoD released the videos in 2020; they remain unidentified publicly. ODNI/AARO reports caution that sensor artifacts, misperception, or balloons/drones explain some cases; they do not claim every case is prosaic. (U.S. Department of Defense, Director of National Intelligence)

Content & Significance of the DIRDs

The DIRD list allows a content analysis of AAWSAP priorities:

  • Propulsion & energy (≥ 15 papers): Warp/metric engineering; wormholes; aneutronic/IEC fusion; MHD; negative mass; quantum vacuum energy; positron propulsion. These topics map to theoretical frontiers with high uncertainty but potentially transformational implications for high-delta-V missions and signature-difficult flight. (Intelligence Resource Program)
  • Materials & structures (≥ 5 papers): Metamaterials, metallic glasses, spintronics, programmable matter; these aim at lightweight, multi-functional, or electromagnetic responses consistent with reports of low observables in some UAP incidents. (Intelligence Resource Program)
  • Sensing, comms, cognition (≥ 6 papers): High-frequency gravitational-wave communications (very speculative), quantum entanglement comms implications, cockpits for breakthrough flight, cognitive limits for multi-vehicle control. (Intelligence Resource Program)
  • Human effects & biosensing (≥ 3 papers): BioMEMS, field effects on biological tissues; relevant to UAP-related physiological reports and to protection for operators. (Intelligence Resource Program)
  • Directed energy (2 versions): A SECRET//NOFORN and an unclassified/FOUO version of high-energy laser weapons state-of-the-art, consistent with defense-warning deliverables. (Intelligence Resource Program)

What’s missing: Experimental breakthroughs, engineering prototypes, or openly published replicable results tied directly to AAWSAP. AARO notes the papers were not thoroughly peer-reviewed and were largely exploratory. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Implications for science, policy, and UAP studies

  1. Institutional signal: Congress and DIA were willing to fund structured study of non-standard aerospace concepts and UAP-adjacent topics. That decision alone legitimized data collection and horizon scanning on phenomena often ignored by mainstream R&D. 
  2. Methodological lesson: The DIRD model produced broad literature syntheses, not hypothesis-testing campaigns. Future programs should fund instrumentation, open data standards, and pre-registered analyses so findings are replicable and falsifiable (a point echoed by ODNI and AARO focus on standardized reporting). (Director of National Intelligence, U.S. Department of Defense)
  3. Governance clarity: The AATIP/AAWSAP naming confusion demonstrates why program-of-record rigor matters: clear authorities, billets, budgets, records, and reporting, the architecture AARO now codifies. (U.S. Department of Defense)
  4. Data continuity: The chain AAWSAP → (informal AATIP) → UAPTF → AARO shows an evolution from bespoke contracting to institutionalized analytic tradecraft across air/sea/space/land domains with quarterly reporting and secure witness channels. (U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense)
  5. Strategic posture: Even as AARO states it found no verifiable evidence of off-world technology, the unresolved minority of UAP cases and the technical ambitions visible in the DIRDs argue for sustained measurement and analysis, especially multi-sensor and open-standard approaches that can illuminate non-prosaic possibilities without prejudging outcomes. (U.S. Department of Defense, Director of National Intelligence)

Frequently asked: Was AAWSAP “about UAP,” “about physics,” or “about both”?

Both, but asymmetrically. The contract language prioritized technology forecasting (12 technical areas), yet AARO confirms the contractor also pursued UAP case review and paranormal investigations, the latter not explicitly authorized in the statement of work. In practice, the DIRDs dominate the documented outputs (38 papers), while UAP case files from AAWSAP are less clearly documented in the public record. (Intelligence Resource Program, U.S. Department of Defense)

“KONA BLUE”

KONA BLUE was a prospective DHS Special Access Program proposal advanced by some AAWSAP alumni after the DIA program ended. It aimed to restart UAP investigations, paranormal inquiry, and reverse-engineering of alleged recovered craft. According to AARO, it gained initial traction but was rejected for lack of merit; no data or material were transferred; and it was not reported to Congress because a SAP was never established. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Contours of the evidence base

  • Government-verified facts (contracts, letters, lists) are robust and linked below.
  • Scientific claims within the DIRDs represent research ambitions and theoretical possibilities, not demonstrated propulsion breakthroughs. (Intelligence Resource Program, U.S. Department of Defense)
  • UAP case evidence improved post-2019 through standardized reporting and the DoD/ODNI reporting cadence, but public datasets remain thin compared to the size of the issue. (Director of National Intelligence)

Practical takeaways

  • Use AAWSAP as a cautionary model: Exploratory papers without measurement campaigns rarely resolve anomalies. Future programs should budget sensors, field experiments, data repositories, and independent statistical reviews.
  • Institutionalize archives: Preserve raw sensor data and metadata under FOIA-compliant retention to avoid future ambiguity about program scope and results.
  • Treat UAP as an intelligence-science hybrid: The DIRD catalog shows why basic research (materials, propulsion) and operational analysis (radar/IR/EO fusion) must be co-funded.
  • Respect heterodoxy; demand rigor: AAWSAP/AAITP explored frontier ideas. The path forward is not to abandon heterodoxy but to design tests that convert possibility into falsifiable hypotheses.

References

  1. DIA FOIA – Under Secretary of Defense memo re: Sen. Reid SAP request; AAWSAP/AATIP context, funding figures (includes Reid letter, talking points, and DIA program review). 
  2. DIA FOIA – AAWSAP contract documentation and modification (HHM402-08-C-0072; solicitation HHM402-08-R-0211). (Defense Intelligence Agency)
  3. DIA FOIA – Program update slides noting contract performance and compliance. (Defense Intelligence Agency)
  4. DIA → Congress: List of 38 AATIP/AAWSAP products (“DIRDs”) with titles/authors. (Intelligence Resource Program)
  5. AARO Historical Record Report (Vol. 1, March 2024) official DoD history covering AAWSAP/AATIP, KONA BLUE, and program distinctions. (U.S. Department of Defense)
  6. DoD press release (Apr 27, 2020) official release of three Navy UAP videos. (U.S. Department of Defense)
  7. ODNI Preliminary Assessment on UAP (June 2021) baseline U.S. government assessment of UAP reporting and issues. (Director of National Intelligence)
  8. DoD release establishing AARO (July 20, 2022) and AARO mission memo. (U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense)
  9. DoD notices on AARO public website (Aug 31, 2023) and secure reporting mechanism (Oct 31, 2023). (U.S. Department of Defense)
  10. DoD statement on delivery of AARO Historical Record Report to Congress (Mar 8, 2024). (U.S. Department of Defense)
  11. ODNI/DoD consolidated UAP annual reporting (2023, 2024) unclassified releases and notices. (Director of National Intelligence, U.S. Department of Defense)

Claims Taxonomy (Evidence status)

Verified

  • AAWSAP was a DIA program funded ~$22M; BAASS received HHM402-08-C-0072 (solicitation HHM402-08-R-0211). 
  • DIA delivered a list of 38 DIRDs to Congress with titles and authors. (Intelligence Resource Program)
  • Reid’s 2009 SAP request exists; USD(I) James R. Clapper recommended denial; DoD declined. 
  • AATIP was not an official DoD program; after AAWSAP’s end, “AATIP” label was used informally by some personnel without billets/budget. (U.S. Department of Defense)
  • DoD officially released three Navy UAP videos in 2020. (U.S. Department of Defense)
  • UAPTF (2020) and AARO (2022–) were formally established and remain the official U.S. structures for UAP issues. (U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense)

Probable

  • AAWSAP’s UAP case files likely include re-evaluations of historical records and interviews beyond what is publicly released, given AARO’s description and the contractor’s role, yet comprehensive public datasets are not available. (Inference from AARO summary.) (U.S. Department of Defense)

Disputed

  • Assertions of recovered off-world craft and standing reverse-engineering programs remain unsubstantiated in AARO’s current record review. (AARO reports substantial investigative effort with no corroboration found to date.) (U.S. Department of Defense)
  • Competing claims about AATIP leadership and scope persist in media and memoir accounts; official documentation does not confirm an AATIP program-of-record with a formally designated director. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Legend

  • Reports of “shadow figures,” “creatures,” and inter-dimensional phenomena at a Utah property associated with program participants are documented by AARO as part of paranormal research undertaken by the contractor; these accounts remain cultural narratives absent verifiable government-archived data. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Misidentification

  • ODNI and AARO caution that some UAP events likely involve balloons, drones, clutter, or sensor artifacts, though not all cases have been resolved. (Director of National Intelligence)

Speculation Labels

Hypothesis

  • The DIRD focus on metric engineering, metamaterials, and bioeffects suggests a working hypothesis that non-conventional propulsion and EM-material interactions could underpin a subset of UAP observables (e.g., acceleration without control surfaces, unusual signatures). This remains unproven absent instrumented, multi-sensor captures with reproducible analysis chains.

Witness Interpretation

  • Military aviators and sensor operators, in several cases associated with the 2004/2015 incidents, interpret their experiences as high-performance non-conventional craft. The videos are verified; the interpretations remain contested pending richer telemetry and environmental data. (U.S. Department of Defense)

Researcher Opinion

  • Some researchers (inside and outside government) argue that open scientific study with public datasets would accelerate resolution and either validate or falsify extraordinary hypotheses. This aligns with AARO/NASA emphasis on better data (as opposed to adjudicating origin claims). (U.S. Department of Defense)

SEO Keywords

AATIP, AAWSAP, Defense Intelligence Reference Documents, DIRDs, DIA BAASS contract HHM402-08-C-0072, Harry Reid SAP letter, AARO Historical Record Report, UAP Task Force, Navy UAP videos, metamaterials, warp drive DIRD, KONA BLUE, UAP policy, UAP research roadmap.

Origin and Ingestion Date

UAPedia Team
Was this article helpful?
Yes No

Related Articles

Want to contribute?

Are you interested in working with us?
Request to Join