Explore Allan Hendry’s rigorous UAP investigations, from CUFOS case studies to witness reliability, misidentification, radar evidence and hypnosis.
Explore Antonio Huneeus’s role in global UAP research, preserving witness testimony, official records and controversies across borders.
Explore Barbara Bartholic’s role in UFO abduction research, her hypnosis methods, collaborations, theories of control, and controversial legacy.
Explore Bill Chalker’s decades of Australian UAP research, from RAAF archives and witness cases to forensic evidence and DNA claims.
Explore Bruce Maccabee’s scientific approach to UAP research, from optical analysis and radar evidence to McMinnville and Kaikōura case studies.
Before redefining UFO abduction research, Budd Hopkins was a renowned abstract artist whose life changed after a 1964 UAP encounter.
Explore Denise Stoner’s UAP contact claims, missing-time cases, hypnosis evidence, MUFON roles, and the limits of abduction research.
Explore Emma Woods’s disputed regression archive, a UFO contact case study on hypnosis, memory, consent and researcher power.
Explore Grant Cameron’s UAP research, from Manitoba’s Charlie Red Star wave to claims that consciousness shapes encounters and experiencer testimony.
Explore Jeffrey Kripal’s approach to UAP contact experiences, linking witness testimony, consciousness, religion and the study of the impossible.
Explore Joe Lewels’s UAP research, from experiencer testimony and media ethics to consciousness, religion, and the controversy over contact.
Harvard psychiatrist John E. Mack bridged clinical science and UAP research, exploring experiencer testimony and reshaping views on human‑nonhuman contact.
Explore Kevin D. Randle’s role in Roswell UAP research, from witness interviews and MOGUL debates to evidence, memory, and self-correction.
Explore Mary Rodwell’s contact research, from experiencer testimony and ACERN to debates over evidence, interpretation, and non-human encounters.
Explore Michael Swords’s rigorous approach to UFO contact and abduction research, balancing witness respect, evidence, and scientific skepticism.